Humboldt County Real Estate Blog

head_left_image

California Budget Crisis in full swing!!

I know many of us have kids in the California School system. This is very very important. When the Governor gets more letters to save the forests than to save our schools, we have a problem!

 

The Governor's Budget Flunks the Basic Test of Government: It Hurts Our Children

The California State PTA is opposing the governor's proposed budget for 2008-09 because it would harm the

youngest and most vulnerable in our state: our children. The proposed budget would make across-the-board

cuts to education, healthcare and other programs that have a direct impact on the safety and well-being of

California's children. Below is a list of budget cuts as proposed by the Governor. As the budget gets debated

in Sacramento, we must make sure our children's voices are heard.

 Cuts to Schools

Given that California has among the lowest per-pupil funding and largest class sizes in the country, the

Governor's proposed budget reductions would make a bad situation even worse, and they are fundamentally

inconsistent with the state's goal of improving student achievement. The Governor is proposing a $4.4 billion

cut to school funding. This could result in the loss of tens of thousands of teachers and increased class sizes

throughout the state, not to mention a further erosion of programs and the support system for students

provided by special education aides, reading specialists, counselors and other support personnel.

 Cuts to Foster Care Programs

Current foster care reimbursement rates are already woefully inadequate. The proposed cuts would ultimately

hurt children and lead to fewer families taking in children who have been abused and neglected.

 Cuts to Child Welfare Services

The proposed 10% reduction to funding for child welfare services would cause an accompanying loss of

federal funds, thus compounding the negative impacts. These cuts would endanger the health and safety of

thousands of neglected and abused children. It would mean the loss of more than a thousand social workers

whom children now rely on to investigate reports of abuse and neglect, provide family maintenance services

and reunite families.

 Cuts to CalWORKs Program that Supports Low Income Families

Research links outcomes for children to the types of sanctions proposed by the administration. Enacting

policies that drop children from CalWORKs and reduce the amount of resources available to their families

would exacerbate the situation and reduce the likelihood of these families becoming self-sufficient.

 Cuts to California Children's Services (CCS) Health Care Program

The proposed cuts to CCS could drastically affect the health care services provided to the severely ill children

served by this program. Medical Therapy cuts would result in longer waiting lists for children to receive

physical therapy. Delays in providing timely medical care to CCS children could result in greater emergency

room usage.

 Cuts to Medi-Cal Administrative Cuts

Nearly 160,000 Medi-Cal children would be required to re-apply for eligibility every three months, instead of

the current annual requirement. While increasing the administrative burden, the budget proposal would at the

same time reduce administrative funding. The result would be gaps in - or the loss of - healthcare coverage

for some of the most vulnerable and needy children in California.

 Cuts to Juvenile Rehabilitation Facilities and Crime Prevention Grants

The proposed $20 million reduction in funds for the Juvenile Probation and Camps program could mean

closure or service reduction of county-operated residential facilities. Displaced wards would be placed in

group homes, thereby increasing impacts on the foster care program. The $11.9 million proposed cut to the

Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Grant program would cause gaps in the continuum of services that counties

have established to prevent, control and treat juvenile offenders.

 Cuts to Early Childhood Education/Child Care

The proposed $198.9 million reduction for child development programs, as well as subsidy criteria changes,

translates into nearly 106,000 children losing access to pre-school and after-school programs, and services that

assist with disabilities.

Our children did not create this financial crisis. Their future should not be undermined because of it.

1 commentJohn Ford • April 06 2008 01:43AM

Comments

Sorry.  I totally support the governor.  "The Kids"--as you call them are--at least half of them--children of wetbacks who do not belong in the school system or in this country period.

If you really want to balance the budget you had better resurrect prop 187 and ammend the state constitution--if necessary--to get it into law.

I pray to God every day that real estate prices in the state continue to drop so the sheep (your constituents) will wake up.  During the last depression in 1930 California picked up all the wet backs, put them on busses, and shipped them back to where they belong.  So maybe a depression will be a good thing.

 

 

 

Posted by michael lavery over 2 years ago

Participate



(optional)
What does the graphic say?